Obama wouldn’t pass a security clearance check

I’m re-posting this because IT ROCKS! Racer Jim posted this on    http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/08/scotus-shattering-8-prominent-groups.html

Even ignoring all the fake birth certificate stuff, and the invalid SSN … this is the best summary of who managed to get elected (through massive fraud on multiple levels) to the highest position in the United States. The person described below would have trouble passing a security clearance to work as a clerk at the White House. This is an embarrassment to the United States, and a reason why we, as a people, really must demand more proof of who our elected officials really are.

FYI – this is all factual and well verified information. If only someone had bothered to check before 2007. Thumbs down MSM. When i get a chance, I will fill in the blanks on this – but read it and weep.

“What I find suspicious is someone who was born to a Muslim Marxist father and an Atheist Communist mother, whose father’s parents also were Muslim Marxists and whose mother’s parents also were Atheist Communists, who spent five years attending grade school in an Islamic (Muslim) country registered under a different name as a citizen of that Islamic (Muslim) country, who was mentored by a radical Marxist member of the Communist Party of the Untied States of America during his teenage and early college years, who sought out and associated with radical Communists and Marxists during college, who was then mentored for twenty years by a Marxist “GOD DAMN AMERICA” Black Theology preacher, who had his political career initiated by the domestic terrorist couple who founded the radical Communist organization “Weather Underground”, who committed perjury on his law license application, who denounced the U.S. Constitution as a doctrine of negative liberties and allowed his publicist’s bio of him to say he was Kenyan born for 17 years through 3-4 revisions running for President of the Untied State of America. 

For crying out loud, all the above notwithstanding, in 2008 the Democratic Party of Hawaii INTENTIONALLY deleted the required by Hawaii law verbiage “under the provision’s of the United States Constitution” from the certification statement on it’s “Official Certification Of Nomination”…effectively certifying Obama not eligible to serve as President. That’s Obama’s own party in his own (birth) state trying to prevent him from being elected. “

Racer jim

Advertisements

Obama Literary Agent Website Bio said “Born in Kenya” for 16 Years

I have been accused, as have many “birthers” have, of being racist because we dared to ask for Mr. Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate. The claim is that no on ever asked any other candidate to prove where they were born – so clearly the need to see the actual certificate was based on racism. I pointed out that no other candidate had indicated that they were born in a foreign country for over 16 years. I was accused of “making up” this fact. I did the following screen shots to prove that I was stating a FACT.

Obama had a bio published by his literary agent Acton & Dystel in 1991 that clearly states he was born in Kenya. I know we have heard the following disclaimer from Miriam Goderich in 2012:

Miriam Goderich edited the text of the bio; she is now a partner at the Dystel & Goderich agency, which lists Obama as one of its current clients.

“This was nothing more than a fact checking error by me–an agency assistant at the time,” Goderich wrote in an emailed statement to Yahoo News. “There was never any information given to us by Obama in any of his correspondence or other communications suggesting in any way that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii. I hope you can communicate to your readers that this was a simple mistake and nothing more.”

It is clear that she is referring to the  1991 brochure published by her company. See full text here:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/born-kenya-obamas-literary-agent-misidentified-birthplace-1991/story?id=16372566

There are two problems here. First, it is industry standard procedure for an author to provide their own bio. After all, they are the writer, and who knows them better than themselves. And even Miriam herself says that she “edited the text of the bio”  and “fact checked it”. Semantics – she never says she wrote it. In fact, on the Dystel & Goderich website, part of the “non fiction submission guidelines” is a “formal narrative bio of the author”http://www.dystel.com/nonfiction-proposal-guidelines/  It seems logical that requirement would have been in place in 1991.

The second problem is that it is not just a brochure published in 1991. The same bio was present on the Acton & Dystel and later Dystel & Goderich website starting in 1998. And it stayed there, and was edited during that time. It added that he was was the Junior Democratic Senator from Illinois, and that he was also the Keynote speaker at the 2004 Democratic Convention. It said “born in Kenya” until April of 2007, even though someone was obviously very diligent about updating it to add important new details.

Does anyone believe that Miriam Goderich was just updating all her clients bios for years, without once asking for an approval or asking for  permission to make the changes? I for one DO NOT think that she did that. Nor do I think that Mr. Obama never ONCE looked at his bio in 16 years. I believe that he was aware of it and was concerned with keeping is up to date and accurate. I believe he wrote it and maintained the “born in Kenya” until such time as it became important to have NOT been born in Kenya. From April 2007 on, he was “born in Hawaii”.

Just look at the screen shots. Does it make sense for anyone to leave inaccurate information on the internet for 16 years? These are from a very interesting site called archive.org – The Wayback Machine. Snapshots of web pages over the years have been preserved there. These are just some of hundreds of dates I could have used from the Dytsel & Goderich website over the last 15 years.

June  27,1998 – Born in Kenya

Dystel Obama Bio1998 - born in Kenya

September 1, 2005 – Junior Democratic Senator and Keynote speaker are added – still born in Kenya

Dystel Obama Bio 2005 Born in Kenya

March 26, 2007 – still “Born in Kenya”

Dystel Obama Bio March 2007 - born in Kenya

July 27, 2007 – A miracle – he was reborn in Hawaii – AND he’s a presidential candidate – how coincidental!  And his poor Dad is no longer a Finance Minister. How sad – just a regular fellow from a small town in Kenya…

Dystel Obama Bio July 2007 - NOW born in Hawaii

So there you have it.  Does anybody out there know anyone else over the age of 6 who has  allowed themselves to be incorrectly represented as having been born in a foreign country for a decade and half? Anyone Googling Barack Obama would have found this bio and would have no reason the doubt he was born in Kenya. This is why so many people are confused about where he was born.

Einstein, Eeyore and Obama’s Birth Certificate Fraud

You know I’m perturbed when I’m about to quote Obama, Einstein, Eeyore from Winnie the Pooh and a fortune cookie all on the same page. The story started Christmas day with the family around the table – just like Norman Rockwell would paint, except for the Pepsi bottle on the table. I had my recently analyzed Registrars Stamp paper with me – (Click here – or see  Page to the left “New Evidence December 2013”) AKA “What I did with my Christmas Vacation”, and was all a tingle to show it to them.

My family is the kind of family that we’d like America to be.  Smart and funny, decently fit and all well employed – a doctor, a professor, a policeman, a CPA , a real estate agent and a pilot – All six nieces and nephews in college or about to be. We also happen to be staunch republicans who are fairly well versed in politics, “thanks” to my parents.  So, I thought they would be thrilled and ecstatic to see what I considered to be – if not a smoking gun, at least a flaming arrow, in the false Obama document saga, and my plan to make Obama go away like a bad dream.

I learned two things that day at the table. First, most people are woefully ignorant und unaware of  the most basic functions and abilities of the simplest of office equipment – the typewriter, the copier, the scanner, the printer and the rubber stamp. All of a sudden my lowly job as an office manager made me feel like a rocket scientist. And I think, as a society, we’ve become so digitized we really have forgotten that there are things that are made of ink and paper and are therefore subject  to the rules of physical reality. These smart people really didn’t seem to grasp the importance of the fact that something that was supposed to be a rubber stamped piece of paper was DIFFERENT than a computer generated stamped piece of paper. One is REAL the other IS NOT REAL.

My mother didn’t even exactly understand what a rubber stamp was and how it worked. She thought the fraud was that the numbers didn’t line up. I guess all my years of turning the little wheel  on my desk date stamp every morning to get the right date to do my job finally paid off – 4 years of college wasted. I had to explain a rubber stamp.

And my brother wanted to know why they bothered changing the number – it seemed irrelevant to him either way  – 25 – 26 – whatever. I almost threw mashed potatoes at him while patiently reemphasizing “That’s not the point! The point is that it WAS CHANGED on a computer. It is NOT A RUBBER STAMP!” Again – we couldn’t get past the rubber stamp and the fact that a computer should have been nowhere near this document.  And here’s where I quote the fortune cookie “Action speaks nothing without the motive”. My brother was fully prepared to overlook the action (computer fraud) because he didn’t know the motive. Sadly, I think many, many people are in that boat. They don’t understand WHY someone would do something like that. Therefore they can’t categorize the action. So they shrug it off  and move on.

Let’s quote Einstein now, “The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” This president has falsified his documents. And we DO know why – because something is really wrong with his past and he is trying to hide it.  And as his employer, we DESERVE to know what the problem is. I asked my brother, “If some guy starts dating your daughter, and pulling her down the wrong path, and you suspect that he might be hiding something, or that he’s not who he says he is – are you just going to shrug that off?” Of course not! In that case, the “shoot first, ask questions later” rule comes into play.  My CPA sister-in-law does employee background checks and wouldn’t hire someone with fake documents, my real estate agent sister-in-law does background checks and won’t represent anyone “fraudulent”, my brother the policeman would investigate identity fraud  of “regular people” as a possible crime,  and they can’t date our daughters if we’re not sure of their background – but they can be president!

Finally, let’s summarize the meal by quoting Eeyore. ” That was my other brother – the policeman – who I really thought would be the one to “get it”. “Look, see – it’s a crime, right?” – I pointed out. To which he said, “You’re preaching to the choir, but”…and here is Eeyore – “Oh, bother. It’s too late now. Nobody is going to do anything.” And my mother chimed in, “Yes, it’s too late. We can’t get him out of office. He won’t leave – and if he is ineligible, what would happen if we did get him out, all the legislation would fall apart, and there would be riots.” And Eeyore again, “Oh bother, I guess we’ll just have to try and survive three more years.”

After this somewhat disheartening meal, I consoled myself with pie, and strengthened my resolve to turn these defeatist quotes around and get this information out, and Obama, too. Here’s the  Obama quote:

“The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.” REVERSE IT – “People with something to hide, don’t want to disclose the truth.”  Now that makes more sense, doesn’t it? This statement, by the way, covers the fortune cookie quote too, about action and motive. Having something to hide is a motive  – falsifying documents is the action.

Now Einstein, “The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” REVERSE IT – “The world CANNOT be destroyed by those who do evil, if those who watch do something to stop it.”

Finally instead of being Eeyore and not “bothering”, let’s be Christopher Robin. Anything is possible if you have a goal and plan, and start the hike. This stamp analysis and blog  are my first steps. I hope millions more start the first step to “bothering”, too – before it really is too late. It seems to me nearly half the country didn’t vote for Obama, and millions more have started to see him for what he really it. We have the numbers if we just start to “bother”.  And  I will  admit, I am very curious to find out WHAT he’s hiding. I’m not sure I even really care what the answer is at this point. It’s a “who dunnit” that’s gone on too long, like some Stephen King novels (sorry Stephen). I mostly just want to know “Who done What and Why.” And no matter what the answer is, it is still fraud, and still a crime, and he still needs to get out of office NOW.

What Makes Me a Low Tech Smarty Pants on Document Analysis

I have followed the Obama long form birth certificate fraud case since the beginning, as it was quite obvious that there WAS fraud – for many reasons, all of which have been well documented by the “experts”. I must admit, when the press and the public chose to ignore the facts, and Obama “won” the 2012 elections – I dropped it, like almost everyone else as a “lost cause”.

Then Dr. Loretta Fuddy died under mysterious circumstances a week or so ago, which concerned me by it’s sheer coincidence – and I started looking again at the documents. I hadn’t previously read the analysis by Mara Zebest, or seen the  High Resolution AP version of the certificate. One of her findings had to do with being to see elements of the Short Form Birth Certificate that bleed through on the Long Form copy and are visible at high zoom by  enhancing the contrast/color etc.

I did this and was astonished to see that this was so – something that shouldn’t be there was. So with the high zoom and high contrast, I started looking at other elements that look “odd” at normal size and found several things  – the most egregious being the problem with the date stamp. It is computer generated – not a rubber stamp as I’ve clearly documented on Page Link to the left – Computer Generated Registrars Stamp  –  Birth Certificate Fraud. There are others, and I will document them shortly.

So, what exactly makes me so particularly qualified to understand and see the fraudulent elements in this document? Well, to start with, my brain loves a good puzzle, I see patterns easily, and I believe nothing until I see it with my own eyes or ears. I’m very tactile, I take things apart to see how they work. I take nothing at face value. Most people who know me find me a little annoying because of these attributes. Wait a minute till I stop crying. Boo hoo.

Secondarily, and maybe more importantly, my age and career path allowed and/or forced me to have an extensive knowledge and understanding of just about every piece of office  equipment used since 1982. I learned to type (with all my fingers) on a manual typewriter with the return bar and the keys on the metal bars. Most people have never seen them. I had an IBM Selectric with the ball in college – boy was I cool. I remember white out and eraseable paper. Changes on real paper were NOT fun or easy, like nowadays. I remember having to retype entire pages if I needed to add information. I KNOW what an uneditable paper document is. I know what it would have taken to type this birth certificate in 1961.

My first job brought me into contact with the first fax machines, and the first Hewlett Packard computers with modems for data entry and transmissions. I also did all the clerical stuff – typing forms, running calculator tapes, rubber stamping deposits.  In those days “cut and paste” really meant you sat at your desk with a pair of scissors and cut up documents and scotch taped them back together in some new configuration, then copied it to make a new document. So I know “cut and paste” from way back. All the crooked lines and the shadows from the tape were hard to hide. If you bumped up the contrast on the copier, it helped but – you couldn’t  do them what you can do now with computers. Oddly, cut and paste on a computer can be nearly flawless. I am actually a little baffled by the crudity and ineptness on this document. I wonder if someone was TRYING to flag this as fraud. Hmmm. If so, we’re letting them down by ignoring it.

So back to office equipment. Computers came in next with Lotus123 database. At that time I was stuck in a deadly dull desk job, and I mastered Lotus123. There was nothing I couldn’t do with that program. I learned fonts and pixels and WYSIWYG. My next job brought me WordPerfect – the original where you had to have markers stuck all over the keyboard to remember the formatting shortcuts. Again, the logic of it appealed to me and I aced it.  Internet came in about that time – and AskJeeves (pre Google). I got a modem and dial up and was surfing when there wasn’t anything to surf.

Then technology exploded. My first digital camera was 1 megapixel. I got a color inkjet printer that came with Photoshop. I’ve had about 5 printers and 3 cameras since then, but I still use my original Photoshop, though I have 8 and 9 and Illustrator, because I know how to use it really well after a decade and half. I got a $1300 flatbed scanner 12 years ago and still use it, though the new $99 OCR document scanner gets more use these days. I now run a small office where I do everything, and as technology moves on, I keep up. And I keep learning.

So there you go. No high tech analysis from me. But I do KNOW what a copy looks like versus a scan. I know what a copier can and can’t do. I know a scanner can be used as a copier to print, but it can also be used to digitize and edit. I know how to edit. I understand pixels and layers and imports and masks. And unlike the old days of “cut and Paste” with tape and scissors, I know what the Adobe products can do. It’s a little scary actually. So, if I see a REAL photocopy, I know what I’m seeing. A copier is full of mirrors. It can only print what it actually sees. If I see scanned copy – all bets are off. I just don’t know where that document has been or what it’s been up to.

I KNOW this Birth Certificate was NEVER copied on a photocopier. This certificate was in a binder with 500 other forms according to the Hawaii Dept. of Health. You can see the way the pages are supposedly folded back on the left. But if this were a photocopy, there would NOT  be the neat little box around the form, and you’d see the edges of the other forms in the book, and shadows because the lid wouldn’t close tightly over a book. NOT a PHOTOCOPY.  The nice neat cropped rectangle around the form indicates that at best it was scan copied and printed. At worst it never even existed in real life and only exists in a digital form, so any print made of it is just a physical representation of the digital document, and that could change day to day. A real paper document can only be changed with white out, scissors and tape – hard to hide. Digital document – easy to hide changes.

That’s why the rubber stamp matters. If it was a Scanned copy of a REAL document, that’s okay – if someone certifies with a REAL hand stamp that nothing has digitally changed between the scanner and the printer. This Birth certificate does NOT HAVE A RUBBER STAMP. It is computer generated – what we are seeing never existed on paper before it was created. And Dr. Fuddy, who certified it,  isn’t here anymore to help us understand what happened. That’s scary, too.

Keep the faith. This is fraud and is a federal crime. There are criminals in the White House.